Independent platform appeal researchOfficial-source registry

Platform appeal intelligence

Source-backed analysis for platform enforcement notices.

AppealSource helps sellers identify what a written TikTok Shop or Amazon notice appears to require, what evidence they can verify, and how to prepare a factual response. Scope is checked before checkout.

Independent analysisOfficial-source groundedNo account access

Structured case analysis

Versioned policy sources

Evidence-first drafting

Fact-fabrication controls

01 / The problem

A high-stakes decision

A generic answer can sound persuasive and still be wrong for the case.

Platform appeals are constrained by the exact notice, the evidence the seller can verify, current platform policy, and the limited opportunity to respond. Writing is the final step—not the first.

ARGUS Review System

A structured review workflow implemented as software.

ARGUS separates classification, policy retrieval, evidence review, drafting, and a final factual-control pass so each output can be checked against the supplied record.

01

Notice classification

Identifies the enforcement type, stated reason, jurisdiction, and whether an appeal path is actually available.

02

Policy and evidence review

Matches the case against dated official sources and produces a case-specific evidence checklist.

03

Controlled drafting

Builds an editable response from the seller’s supplied facts—without inventing dates, documents, or corrective actions.

04

Integrity controls

Separates policy support from assumptions and flags missing facts before the report is delivered.

Not a general-purpose chatbot.

AppealSource operates inside a defined case workflow. It limits scope before payment, retrieves the relevant policy corpus, preserves the case version, and returns a structured report rather than an unconstrained conversation.

See how ARGUS reviews a case →

Why the distinction matters

Language generation is only one component of the review.

Review controlGeneral AI chatAppealSource
Platform-specific intakeUser must design itBuilt into the case flow
Official policy retrievalOptional or inconsistentRequired for delivery
Evidence checklistPrompt-dependentCase-specific output
Unsupported fact controlsNo fixed workflowExplicit guardrails
Case record and versionConversation historyStructured private report

Platforms we cover

Choose your platform, then your marketplace.

Each platform has its own policy sources and case review. Select the country shown in your seller account when you start the free issue check.

Coverage available

TikTok Shop

Seller and listing enforcement

🇺🇸 United States🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Open service →
Coverage available

Amazon Seller

Account and listing enforcement

🇺🇸 United States🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Open service →
Next platform under review

Etsy

Seller account appeals in the US and UK

Coverage in validation · No checkout yet
Future seller audience

China / Hong Kong

Cross-border sellers using US or UK marketplaces

Market research · No checkout yet

Client record

Credibility should be documented, not manufactured.

Verified client feedback and anonymized case outcomes will be published here only with permission and enough context to be meaningful.

Public case recordsPending verified publication
We do not publish invented testimonials, anonymous success rates, or guarantees of reinstatement.

Platform-specific services

Each enforcement system requires its own rules, evidence, and appeal path.

View coverage registry

New platforms are released after source and workflow verification.

Optional analytics

With your permission, we use limited site-usage measurement and save the public pages you visit in this tab to understand the steps before a purchase. We do not send notices, emails, case IDs, or payment-provider IDs to Google Analytics.